![]() Its late here and I hope this makes some level of sense to you and didn't come out like I was rambling!! 78 Bronze but because he hasn't changed the Bronze listing I think most people, and obviously you, are confused by this. He has since made the "Slim" which he now considers to be more aggressive than the. 78 Bronze he said was the most aggressive razor in the line up just as it say on the Bronze listing on the site you referenced. That is only determined by who is using it as we all know YMMV goes very far in wet shaving as what works for me might not work for you and visa versa.Īs to Matt Timeless, I saw a video at some point where he was describing the characteristics of the different razors he had and at the time the. Now with that being said, just because a razor is aggressive doesn't necessarily mean it will be more efficient than a mild razor. ie the Blackbird would be aggressive where the Henson would be mild. Efficiency is how the razor removes stubble or growth whereas aggressiveness describes the razor in general. That's my guess too, but I've used both the Slim and the Bronze 78 which confuses the issue for me I've not used either "enough" though.Ĭlick to expand.In my opinion, aggressiveness and efficiency are 2 completely different things but they do coexist together. I wish that were universal, but it's not. I try not to use the word aggressive without defining what I mean. ![]() It seems to me you and I probably see things much the same way, but how do you know Matt's on the same page? Hopefully, you've discussed it with him. An example of that sort of razor would be the FOCS, but there are others of course. As if an aggressive razor by definition aggressively gobbles up whiskers and skin all in one big bite.Īs I see it, a razor can be smooth feeling on the skin, not prone to biting, comfortable to use, and not irritating to the skin and at the same time it can also be efficient. I realize a lot of people use aggressive to mean some mysterious combination of what I mean by aggressive combined with efficient. Rough as opposed to smooth feeling on the skin. ![]() 68 lacking in efficiency for me.Not saying you're wrong here, but how do you know that's what Matt means.Īggressive to me means one or more of several things. 95 plates, I'm an every other day shaver and found the. I found the SS was just a bit too heavy for me but still shaved very well.Īs for the difference between the. I purchased a matte SS95SB in Jan 2019 because I was curious about the weight difference and some mentioned the SS shaved better, not in my opinion!! I then sold the matte and purchased a polished SS95DC w/Scalloped top cap because I wanted a DC and some people said the polished was smoother than the matte, again not in my opinion!! I'm not saying I had bad shaving experiences with either SS option because they both gave me BBS results that lasted in the 20+hr range, I just and still feel the shave, face feel, and weight of the Titanium is better for me. 95 DC OC/SB plate to replace what I had because I found using the OC for the 1st pass and SB for the 2nd pass gave me 20+hr results every shave out. The only difference is today I sold both SB plates and purchased a. I originally purchased my Ti95/68SB in Feb 2018 and have been so happy with it that it is the sole razor that I own today and most likely the last razor I will ever own. I have owned 3 different finishes with the Titanium version being the only one that survived in my cabinet.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |